The Central Election Commission refused to register for elections in the Novosibirsk Region Party RPR-Parnassus, the opposition is contested. In connection with the controversial issue of the CEC has landed “landing” of the opposition: Alexei Navalny in the company of Mikhail Kasyanov and Ilya Yashin.
At its Friday meeting, the CEC considered the appeal on the RPR-Parnassus oblizbirkom Novosibirsk, which is July 27 refused to register the party list in the elections to the Legislative Assembly of the region. CEC decision was predictable – the eve of the working group recommended that the Central Electoral Commission to uphold the decision of Novosibirsk colleagues. Nevertheless, at the meeting of the commission earnings opposition leaders Alexei Navalny, chairman Parnas Mikhail Kasyanov and his deputy, Ilya Yashin, who, incidentally, heads the list of the party in the elections in the Kostroma region. In this region, too, the opposition was denied registration – but so far only a working group at the level of regional election committee.
The first two agenda items, which are considered on Friday CEC, the scandal is not promised, and therefore in the hall reigned serene atmosphere. Serenity start slowly evaporate when the turn came to the third question – Complaints RPR-Parnassus.
First, the member of the CEC Sergey Danilenko, head of the working group to examine the claims of the opposition. As already reported, “Times” in the Novosibirsk Region Party handed over 11,682 signatures of citizens with the required minimum of 10 657. The audit Novosibirsk oblizbirkom invalidated autograph 1342, of which the lion’s share was rejected on the grounds that the data presented in signature sheets, at odds with the regional FMS database. RPR-Parnassus, in turn, argues that much obsolete data contained in the database of the Federal Migration Service. On this basis, the opposition demanded to remove marked “invalid” with all the signatures, which rejected the Migration Service – which is 1217 pieces. At the same time that the list of registered parties, the opposition had to fight off a lot less autograph – 317.
«Too many signatures that were appealed, mentioned in the document (complaint RPR-Parnassus. -” Times “) twice or even three times. And we had quite a long time to establish how much all the same signatures really appealed – began to report on the results of the audit working group of the CEC Danilenko. – When we finally figured out it was found that appealed only 305 signatures. ”
That is 12 autographs less than the party you need to register – just that clearly hinted CEC representative.
«Therefore, we concluded that the number of contested signatures the party, unfortunately, not very concerned,” – informed the audience without Danilenko all, however, regret in his voice.
The requirement for the opposition to annul the once all autographs, discarded on the basis of the FMS database, the working group has rejected.
«We proceeded from the fact that it is necessary to consider separately each signature,” – said a member of the CEC, and then be happy to have listed what other defects found in the complaint RPR-Parnassus.
«16 signatures that were appealed, generally no one recognized invalid; 47 signatures were excluded from the number of invalid before the meeting of the Novosibirsk Regional Election Commission (probably at the level of the working group oblizbirkoma. – “Times”), another part of the signatures are not appealed by the grounds on which were declared invalid. ” As an illustration of the latter assertion Danilenko gave the example scandal with “Daria Timurovich” – a woman whose first name was listed in the certificate FMS masculine. “In this case, the signature has been revoked because this citizen was removed from the register,” – he reported to a member of the CEC.
More than 200 autographs, according to Danilenko, were invalid on the basis of examination of handwriting from the Institute of Criminology. He did not say that the institute is run by the FSB, but this fact was already known to all present. The audit of the working group recognized the authentic signature of 10,191 – is even less than the declared oblizbirkom Novosibirsk. Thus, it was proposed to refuse to register the party.
When a small rostrum, Mikhail Kasyanov, it turned out that the microphone is off . He quickly turned, but stentorian voice of former Prime Minister was heard and so. Stating that under the Constitution the power belongs to the people who exercise will through elections, Kasyanov said that the CEC is obliged to monitor compliance with this law.
«RPR-Parnassus collect the necessary number of signatures, and even with the stock. None of them – I want to emphasize this – is not recognized as false, that is a fake. We are only talking about invalid. Thus, citizens expressed their support to us. This means that the decision of the Novosibirsk regional executive committee – the name of the agency confused Kasyanov – should be abolished! »
His speech lasted for about a minute. In the final, there was a call: “We appeal to the CEC with a request to prevent the violation of human rights in Novosibirsk Oblast Executive Committee and to register our party!»
Representatives of the “Executive Committee” also participated in the meeting of the CEC in the conference call, but to inform policy, he had, without noticing, claims against the non-existent in the nature department, did not. Delicately silent and members of the CEC.
Lawyer RPR-Parnas Ivan Zhdanov in his speech partly repeated the arguments set out in the complaint: as a number of data contained in the Novosibirsk-based FMS, obsolete, and the opposition has no way of knowing the exact number of errors in the certificate that Office submitted a oblizbirkom, the party proposes to recognize all false certificate FMS.
«Besides, now all of a sudden gets the help of experts of the FSB, according to which another 220 signatures invalid. So show them to us! Let’s look at each signature! “- Called a lawyer from the rostrum. And in general, he said, it is unclear on what basis the expertise of the experts were recruited FSB – the law about the possibility of interaction with them does not say anything.
Because of the regulations speaking time everyone has not come yet, the CEC members did not respond to Zhdanov. But later said that nothing illegal in bringing together experts from the intelligence services not.
When the turn came to the performances of Alexei Navalny, Vladimir Churov, before sitting in a relaxed pose, much to pick up and stopped looking at the table.
«I suddenly realized for myself that in recent years advocate on your side, participating in the elections – he said opposition members of the CEC. – Many people say that it is meaningless to participate in elections. And we are engaged. ”
«Get to the point” – he demanded Churov. The previous speakers from the opposition, he did not interrupt.
«Now I’ll get to the point, you will understand me” – promised Churov Bulk. The meaning of his future speech lay in the fact that the citizens want to hear alternative views, but do not allow the opposition to the elections, and as a result the power gets low turnout. As an example of opposition led last year’s elections in the Moscow City Duma.
«What is happening now is like the old Soviet anecdote, when a man went to the store for toilet paper, which was not for sale. But he could not refuse, and so began to ask different questions, asked to see different things. The man did all this, but the paper he would not have sold. Democratic coalition went to the polls in four regions, but in fact no one was admitted to these elections (from the RPR-Parnassus registered only four single-seat districts. – “Times”) – was indignant opposition. – So you’ll excuse me, dear members of the CEC, but I need you to stop watching and casuistry. Moreover, the law is on our side. ”
«Please observe the regulatory language” – suddenly asked, “Dear Chairman of the CEC.” What exactly hurt his speech in bulk, Churov did not elaborate.
«Everything was legal,” – in turn, said the speaker, requesting to register the list of the party in all regions where it is intended to participate, outlining while the consequences of refusing the opposition to participate in elections.
Once the parties stated their positions, it is the turn of questions.
A member of the CEC Siyabshah Shapiev asked the representatives of the Novosibirsk election commission are still connected via videoconference, “whether there was falsification of signatures collectors” RPR-Parnassus, and if so, what was the percentage of fraud. The answer to this question Shapiev heard. Churov asked the colleagues from Novosibirsk are not responsible, because “it will bear the legal consequences”, because there is a court decision.
A member of the Central Executive Committee in an advisory capacity Alla Aksenov said, “whether she understands” that even if the complaint of the opposition will be satisfied in full, it still “will not lead to the registration of the party?” Aksyonov explicitly appealed to the report of Sergey Danilenko, according to which the number of signatures contested RPR-Parnassus, is still not enough for registration. After a brief altercation with lawyer Ivan Zhdanov Party Aksyonov said that not received an answer to a question.
«You have written as amicably and harmoniously worked your headquarters. If so, why were the statements to the Investigative Committee as from your collectors? “- He asked the CEC member with an advisory vote Evgeny Shevchenko. “I would also like to ask this question Bastrykin! – Said the lawyer Parnassus. – And why did the starving people in Novosibirsk every day interrogates the UK? Is not that pressure on us? »
The atmosphere in the room grew tense before our eyes.
The deputy chairman of CEC Leonid Ivlev asked a series of “Have you stopped to drink brandy in the morning?”.
«You do not have any desire to explore the 67th federal law (” On basic guarantees of electoral rights of citizens. “-” Times “), as well as legislation of the Novosibirsk region and to act according to the law?” – He asked he.
«I have to answer that question?” – Somehow, even taken aback attorney Zhdanov.
«No», – he allows Churov.
And Zhdanov did not answer.
Meanwhile, perseverance demonstrated Aksenov, which again demanded the words: “I believe that it is necessary to satisfy the complaint RPR-Parnassus to stupidity each was visible in full”.
«Alla A., another rude and I put to the vote the question of removing you from the audience”, – has threatened the head of the CEC. “So I did not call anyone personally. – Alla A. made big eyes. – But when the party does not want to participate in the elections, and she writes about it in the complaint, it is strange. ”
Asked Ivan Zhdanov and how in the ranks of collecting signatures appeared member of the precinct election commission with decisive votes. The law prohibits such citizens to collect autographs, which is why 71 signature above the garbage collected was rejected by the working group of the CEC. Lawyer RPR-Parnas said that the party does not have the ability to check data on all without exception pickers.
Churov this recognition was pleased: “I liked the answer. There is a fact that a certain number of mistakes were made inspection bodies. Approach colleagues (ie opposition. – “Times”) as follows: once identified errors must be canceled the entire array (signatures invalid. – “Times”). But they have the same pattern – one of the builders were allowed to members of election commissions. Then on our part should be the same approach (the opposition refuse all claims. – “Times”). That’s it “, – concluded the chairman of the CEC. And, after a moment’s pause, thoughtfully he added, “What I am old already.”
At this point, the opposition managed to phone from the pickers, who allegedly was a member of the precinct election commissions, and get her rebuttal in this regard. But in principle it could not change anything.
The question of the refusal RPR-Parnassus the complaint has been put to the vote. The decision was taken unanimously. There were no abstentions.
After the meeting, Kasyanov told “Gazeta.ru” that the party intends to appeal the verdict of the CEC in court. But, according to the policy, it would be largely formal way: the decision of the court is predictable, but the opposition believes that it should go all the way to the end.
«Today you have visited the CEC for the first time?” – Asked the correspondent of “Gazety.Ru” Alexei Navalny. Oppositionist gave an affirmative answer.
When asked what impression it made personally Vladimir Churov, the oppositionist said that the head of the CEC looked the same, “as in the famous painting where he sits with Medvedev, and below the signature:” Thank you for grandfather win! »
It is understood fotozhaba, which is widely sold on the Internet after the Duma elections in 2011. 
No comments:
Post a Comment