Yesterday was charged with “taking bribes on a large scale” (Art. 6, Art. 290 of the Criminal Code), the ex-deputy head of the CSO TFR in Moscow Denis Nikandrov and the chief of central administrative board of interagency cooperation and private security TFR Mikhail Maksimenko. According to investigators, officers received a reward from the kingpin Zachary Kalashova (Shakro Young) for retraining instituted against him criminal case at hand. Themselves figures of guilt did not recognize, arguing that, even if interested, could not influence the course of the investigation.
As explained by “Kommersant” Representatives Dennis Nikandrova and Mikhail Maksimenko, the interrogations took place yesterday, they did not use allows not to incriminate oneself Art. 51 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and refused to answer questions because the charges were not specified. “Investigator of the FSB of the Russian Federation Mikhail Savitsky explained to them their rights and the charges just text proposed read, leaving all questions no comment” – described the consequences of the position of one of the lawyers. With this in mind and submitted evidence of FSB involvement in the ex-employees of the TFR to bribe protection considered inconclusive.
According to the source “b”, accusations Nikandrova and Maksimenko built largely on the testimony of one of the alleged middleman in the transfer of bribes – a former police officer and now head of Chop Dmitry Zvontsova. Zvontsov, agreed to cooperate with the investigation as part of the agreement, according to interlocutor, “Kommersant”, acknowledged that the contacts were made through him Zacharias Kalashova with law enforcement agencies. He allegedly transferred the money and the thief-in-law, General Nikandrov intended for the collapse of the criminal case. However, Dmitry Zvontsov said that he was only one link in a long chain of intermediaries, therefore, neither the sender nor the recipient of the money, they say, never seen. About the one who ultimately who pays repentant guard heard only from the other intermediaries, which directly contacted.
According to the representatives of the defendants, even with selfish interest, Denis Nikandrov and Mikhail Maksimenko would not be able to perform the alleged its obligations to the briber – that is, to break up the criminal case against Shakro people. It appeared, we recall, in December last year, after the improvised “authority” tried to take away restaurant on the street Rochdelskaya his owner. On the side of the victim then made by the representatives of the law office “dictatorship of law”, a fight started shooting, and its result was the death of two soldiers and the arrest Shakro his two brigadiers on charges of extortion.
As a further dismantling of the stage the attackers claimed to be acting on the orders of Zachary Kalashova, the situation became dangerous for him, and allegedly became Shakro seek leverage on the investigation. After the “approach” to Maksimenko and Nikandrov was found, a case of extortion, according to investigators, was transferred from the CSO TFR Moscow Investigation TFR management of the Central Administrative District (CAO) and there is reclassified to a softer article of the Criminal Code – to arbitrariness . This solution has allowed two representatives Shakro get out of jail. Hide them, however, failed because the situation at that time secretly controlled FSB operatives.
However, as explained by the “b” representative of the accused, the initiative of the diversion in this case did not come “from above” and “below”. After evaluating the materials of the criminal case referred to it, the investigator TFR in the CAO did not see in it the composition of extortion, arguing that the conflict took place just arbitrariness. Given the fact that the criminal case of the dismantling on Rochdelskaya received publicity, to take responsibility for retraining crime investigator did not, therefore, attracted to addressing regulatory authorities. In particular, the TFR Management Guide CAO and procedural control department GUS TFR in Moscow. Finally, a copy of the decision to reclassify was transferred to verify its legality in Mosprokuraturu, and all of these agencies have recognized the decision reasoned and justified.
Influence directly to all supervising authorities, Deputy CSO chapters on Nikandrov Moscow as head of the central board of the TFR Maksimenko, according to defenders, could not, and, consequently, to take on such a commitment I would never become.
It should be noted that the arguments of the defendants in the case and their advocates are not impressed by the investigator of the FSB – the procedure charge took place at his intended plan. Most likely, at its disposal there is more compelling evidence of involvement of employees of the TFR to the alleged crimes, which he prefers not to spread.
No comments:
Post a Comment