The State Duma of the Russian Federation
The deputies voted in the second and third readings of amendments for the adoption of counter-terrorism. Sudden removal of these items on the deprivation of nationality and the right to leave the deputies called “Finding the right solution»
The State Duma adopted in the second and third readings of “anti-terrorism package” deputy Irina Spring and Senator Viktor Ozerov. Parliament split: for the amendments to the law voted 287 deputies, against – 147, one abstention. Against were KPRF and LDPR. Similarly voted for the second part of the package – the amendments to the Criminal Code:. For – 277 deputies, against – 148
The bill toughens punishment in most “extremist” articles, lowers the age of criminal responsibility for terrorism, introduces a number of new restrictions, including a ban on missionary activity in a residential area. The first version of the bill requires a procedure such as deprivation of citizenship for terrorist crimes, hostage-taking and violent seizure of power; it contained a ban on leaving the country in case of a citizen of an official warning about the inadmissibility of actions that create conditions for the commission of terrorist crimes. The package was developed with the assistance of the Security Council, told RBC interlocutors in committee on security.
The second reading of the Committee on Security on Monday removed the rules on the travel ban in the case of official warnings, but have expanded the list of reasons for the deprivation of nationality, including in which items such as work in the authorities of other countries and working in foreign NGOs.
The second reading scheduled for Wednesday, but suddenly the deputies moved him on Friday, but on Thursday unexpectedly removed from the draft all the rules of deprivation citizenship and departure.
Why MPs changed their minds
deputy Chairman of the security Committee, Ernest Valeev explained hasty processing resonant “anti-terrorism package” deputy Irina Spring. “It was the search for the right solution,” – said RBC Valeev. When asked RBC why on Monday the committee approved the deprivation of Russian citizenship and restriction on travel and on Friday abandoned these rules Valeev said: “Regulation is not broken, the bills can be refined down to their consideration at the plenary session, it is usual practice” .
Asked RBC influenced the decision of whether to change the package of publicity, Valeev not clearly answered by saying that “in a society have different views.” “Under the society I mean the people and power structures, different views in the Duma factions. We came from a desire to do everything better, “- said MP
Assistant Spring Maria Chekaldin on request RBC to comment on the refusal to revoke the citizenship and limit exit said that will give deputies’ questions, but that is unlikely to comment on this <.. / p>
commuted on extremism will not
During the discussion of the package of amendments Duma deputies rejected several proposals to mitigate the bills. The deputy head of the LDPR faction Alexei Didenko, proposed to exclude from the bill increasing penalties under the Criminal Code “extremist articles” (282). LDPR faction in general in favor of the abolition of these articles. “Last year, more than 500 people were sentenced for 282, and none of them was not a terrorist. Basically it is the person that made some kind of statement, repost on social networks. They include youth representatives who are radically different views. But the deep conviction of the LDPR faction, that because of this, from a young age it is impossible to break the life of a man “- explained Didenko. But I think it has rejected an offer
Gudkov suggested that the new package of the crime -. Promoting extremist activity. He gave several examples of how the criminal case for extremism excited for the publication of pictures in social networks. “And what is the promotion of extremism? The taxi driver, who will drive the girl who has published picture “VKontakte”? I propose to abolish it and not have to shame, “- said Gudkov. Duma rejected his proposal.
The opposition MP also proposed to abolish the “cannibalistic norm” to reduce the age of criminal responsibility in a number of articles of the Criminal Code to 14 years. “For failing to report a crime, we offer a place a child of 14 years for taking part in the riots, although we have a riot can be understood as anything. The psyche of the child at this age is not formed, it will tell you any psychologists. The child needs rehabilitation, not jail. From there he will come prepared criminal “, – wondered Gudkov. “The level of mental and physical development of the teenager at this age allows you to realize the social danger of these acts and the responsibility for these acts. The Committee discussed this issue with the experts “- retorted Valeev. Duma Gudkov rejected the proposal.
Gudkov also opposed the criminal liability for failure to report a crime. “Boy Vasya somewhere rashly to say” I hate corrupt officials, would shoot them all, “and the boy Peter just do not report it. Both boys go to jail, that’s what is proposed “, – cited the example of the MP
« The success of the fight against terrorism depends not only on the actions of the security forces and government agencies, but also from the public action.. We believe that the rule of law will boost the population of Action on terrorism obstacle “, – said Valeev. The proposal was rejected by the Gudkov. Gudkov also opposed the storing of calls and messages, data carriers, saying it damages incurred by the business. Valeev said that the storage times agreed, and the amendment was rejected Gudkov.
No comments:
Post a Comment