Thursday, February 2, 2017

Questioning non-residents of Kirov – merchant

the court in the case of “Kirovles” their evidence began to present the lawyers of Alexei Navalny and Peter ofitserova. Was questioned and the defendants. Tomorrow the judge may announce the date of the debate and then the verdict.

On the 12th meeting in the matter of “Kirovles” Alexei Navalny and Peter Officers came not only as defendants but also while under house arrest of Kirov — decision on this measure until February 10, judge Alex vtyurin ruled on Wednesday, thus the time frame when the sentence is likely to be announced.

After your evidence is finished to present to the public prosecutors, this right passed to the defenders of the defendants. The lawyer Pyotr Ofitserov Svetlana Davydova invited the court to request payment order “Vyatka forest company” for the period 2009-2011 and payment documents of “Kirovles” for the same period to compare, have purchased the company of mister ofitserova wood at a reduced price — lower than for all others.

— I strongly support this petition,— said Alexei Navalny.— The key issue of this case — just go and compare prices. At what price I bought the forest Officers, and some bought others. You will see a large number of clients who bought cheaper than Officers.

— never proved that prices were lower selling, no any documents are not presented, supported by his counsel and himself, Mr. Officers.

But prosecutors suggested a motion to dismiss, arguing that it is not related to the case, and the judge vtyurin after a short pause, agreed with them.

“Your honor, the court has now eliminated even from trying to hold a fair trial— outraged Mr. Bulk.— This is a process not an accusatory manner, and with a predetermined decision!”

Rejected vtyurin Alexey and the petition for subpoena all witnesses for the defense, but agreed to the reading of the written materials of the case, which, as stated, the lawyers, testify in favor of their clients.

While the meeting was adjourned for lunch, from the European court of human rights came the news that there was granted several complaints about Alexei Navalny to your detention and administrative arrests, and the ECHR has obliged to pay to the founder of Fund of fight against corruption €63 thousand as compensation. When the court resumed, the lawyer Davydova about an hour read different case materials from letters of Peter ofitserova in the “Kirovles”, where he asked how to repay their debt to the state, to positive characteristics on him, signed by the leader of the Moscow Yabloko Sergei Mitrokhin. When the reading interest lawyers documents was completed, the court passed to interrogation of Alexey Navalny.

Political motives of this case proved many times, he said, reminding about the decisions of the ECHR and the decision to cancel the first verdict in the “Kirovles”.— I really was adviser to the Governor on public principles, I never was an officer. No one person, who worked in the Kirov region or follows the policy, there was no doubt as to my status.

Peter Officers told the defendant himself came to the Kirov oblast and decided to engage in timber business, after reading the appeals of the Governor Nikita Belykh to investors. He remembered in detail, as it stopped working in Kirov, he went to study at Yale University, she founded the FBC, and after that there was the matter of “Kirovles”, which was closed a few times because the investigators failed to find any evidence, but on the instructions of head SK Alexander Bastrykin was brought to court.

— Your honor, do you want us to bust a selfie? — suggested after another break, the defendant to the judge, but he idea is not supported.

the Interrogation of Mr. Navalny lasted a little over an hour, and when the questions from the prosecutors was over, he invited them to visit, which actually happened to the 16 million rubles, the theft of which he is suspected. But, as noted by “the Media”, found no response and this initiative.

After him questioning began and Peter ofitserova. “I plead guilty to not recognize this crime was not. Moreover, the Supreme court based on the decision of the ECHR made a decision,”— said the former head of the VLK and detail began to tell the court how were watching Nikita Belykh as Governor, as first arrived in the Kirov region, and decided to try his hand in the timber business, as he was acquainted with the work of “Kirovles”. “Of those three contracts that “Kirovles” was adopted, and they were doing one,” he said, and seven out of ten cases of KOGUP gave a negative decision on the proposed orders because of the impossibility to perform the desired configuration or poor equipment of forestry enterprises.

to Talk about his unsuccessful attempt to engage in timber business in Kirov, Pyotr Ofitserov could have a long time, but then the judge vtyurin Alexey remembered an appointment, and proposed to continue the interrogation of the second accused at the next meeting, which will take place tomorrow.

Ilya Barabanov





How to listen to witnesses in the case of “Kirovles”

Several new prosecution witnesses made on 19 January in the Leninsky district court of Kirov. With the auditor Tatiana Zagoskina who superintended the work of “Kirovles” in 2009, the defendant and the founder of the Fund of struggle against corruption Alexei Navalny entered into a discussion about feelings and overmature aspen. Read more

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment