the New York Times published an article which claims that Russia is allegedly the first time admitted that Russian officials were directly involved in the work of the so-called state doping system. A newspaper made of words of the acting head of the Russian anti-doping Agency (RUSADA) Anna Antselevich. However, RUSADA has said that the words of Mrs. Antselovich was taken out of context.
the New York Times came out with the material in which it is alleged that Russian officials no longer deny the fact that there were “state-sponsored doping system.” Recall that this is stated in the report of the independent expert of the world anti-doping Agency (WADA) Richard McLaren.
The New York Times quotes the acting head of RUSADA Anna Antselevich, which allegedly stated that the journalist had “institutional conspiracy”. The lady Antselovich noted that collusion was not involved representatives of the government. Note that the Russian authorities have repeatedly denied accusations that they condoned the use by athletes of doping.
RUSADA has denied approval of the newspaper. “In response to the publication in the newspaper The New York Times RUSADA says that the words of the acting Director General of Antselovich were distorted and taken out of context, the statement of RUSADA.— In the course of the conversation Antselovich with journalist Rebecca Ruiz, acting Director General remark was made that the report, published on 9 December 2016, Richard McLaren refused to words "state system of doping" and used the phrase "institutional conspiracy", excluding, therefore, the possible involvement of the highest leadership of the country. Unfortunately, Rebecca Ruiz, was taken out of context these words, gave the impression that the leadership of the journalist acknowledges the existence of institutional schemes of doping in Russia.”
an Article in The New York Times in Russia yesterday, said the press Secretary of the President Dmitry Peskov. “We are not inclined to accept such information as the source,— said Mr. Sands.— You need to check the authenticity of these words, we are not yet able to say anything. All of this is true whether the actual words that are attributed to Antselovich that meant, in what context — all this must be understood in order to draw any conclusions.”
a member of the state Duma Committee on physical culture and sport Dmitry Svishchev in the air “Kommersant FM”: “Why not come up with, if only we pinch, prick, so I grasp every nuance. I’m sure Mrs. Antselovich, when he gave an interview to The New York Times, after all, probably had something else in mind. Most likely, there is a version of the correspondents, who began for her and to think out”. Read more
in Russia want to resist the accusations of doping
the Issues related to doping and the fight with him in the near future will not lose its relevance to the national sport. Moreover, he might again, as before the Olympic games in Rio de Janeiro, will have to fight in order to maintain their status. Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment