– No, we hope to provide his appearance, but ask the Court to be notified agenda – asked Anna Polozova.
– The life we have is unstable, and Alexei A. sits for 15 days or he gets house arrest, house arrest – said Alburi.
The presiding officer refused the application for calling Navalny in court, according to the judge, Navalny not currently any restrictions from the government, which means he will be able to come to their own process.
Then the indictment was made public prosecutor. Thus, according to the prosecution, Alburi and another member of FBC Nikita Kulachenko stolen cellular picture hanging on the fence. Later, they gave this painting spouse Navalny. As a result of “bad good man” found in the apartment during the search Navalny June 20, 2014 as part of the investigation into the theft of money from the “Union of Right Forces.” Bulk explained that this picture of foundation staff gave him for his birthday.
Another accused Kulachenko left Russia. He was charged in absentia and declared the federal wanted list, and in his parents’ apartment was searched and seized computers. The case against Kulachenkova will be considered separately.
“We can not accept this accusation. In the case of missing any of the crime,” – said Alburi.
He added that he agreed with the original decision of the prosecutor’s office, where representatives of the agency refused to take the case to court.
The preliminary investigation of the criminal case was completed in November last year. But first try it did not come to court – prosecutors returned the case for further investigation. Then Alburi found interesting in the business correspondence, which were the reasons why the case could not be taken to court. In this dialogue, attended Deputy Prosecutor General Viktor Grin, the Prosecutor General and the head of the gull Bastrykin RF IC.
In turn, the Prosecutor General’s Office in the face of Greene felt that in no signs of theft: in particular, there was no evidence that the picture belongs to cellular, and that he has suffered significant damage. However, the committee Bastrykina insisted that prosecutors claim “illegal and unreasonable.” Then join the conversation Seagull and said that his deputy rightly decided to return the case to the investigation because the preliminary investigation, in addition to the previously identified violations have not established “place and functionality” of the fence. In the end, the UK has made that deal still to court.
The first in the process of interviewing the victim honeycomb.
– How do you feel? – Attorney began.
– Anxious – quietly replied the victim.
– Do not worry.
During the interrogation Sotov talked a little bit about myself: now works as a janitor, studied at the Art University, after the army he worked in an art gallery. Exhibitions, and some work has been exhibited in Moscow, boasted the victim.
– Many exhibitions made in the homes of culture, in schools and on the streets – said Sotov.
He added that the drawing in the style “social graphs”.
“I call it a” reflection of life ‘, reveals the evils of society – said the victim. – Many passers-by in the city know my work “.
According to the cell phone, currently an exhibition of the artist in one of Vladimir hostels. In 2014, the artist exhibited his work on the fence near the local train station.
“I was standing in a corner and listen to feedback passers-by. I hear more accolades” – again praise Sotov.
In particular, drawing “Bad good man” Mobile painted with watercolors, on the one side of the picture depicted the good qualities of the person, and the other – bad. The victim could not remember when painting hung on the fence. “Perhaps, in May 2014,” – suggested Sotov.
A month later, the victim discovered the theft of the picture. And on the same day, according to the cell phone, he was approached by an unknown man offered him to call the police and write a statement about the stolen paintings. Man offered cellular pass to the police car, which was not far from them. And on the same day Sotov wrote a statement about the theft.
– How much do you rate this picture? – Asked the prosecutor.
– I appreciate her five thousand. Not a million is for her to ask – Sotov said.
He explained that his drawings hung on the fence to please residents of Vladimir. Often the work of the port from rain or come unstuck, complained cell phone. At the same time, he added that he often take pictures, but not before he turned to law enforcement agencies, statements about the loss.
Defender Alburova asked whether the victim gave an interview to a journalist” Russian planet. ” Combs confirmed that he talked with a reporter, read the text of the interview and nothing in the text did not notice the strange.
At the beginning of September on the site “Russian planet” published an interview with the victim, cellular, who explained that a statement about the theft of paintings he written at the request of the police, and later wanted to take from the Department of protocol and his testimony, but he refused. As it turned out, he did not mind when his paintings removed from the fence, where he post them, and take away.
After the victim questioned nnachalnika offices stolen vehicle in the police department for the city of Vladimir Myasnikov Nicholas, who took a statement from the victim. According to the witness, Cell appealed to him to make a statement about the theft. The document victim said that working as an artist and organized an exhibition on the fence on the so-called descent to the train station. According Myasnikov, cell sat in his official car, where he gave an explanation of the loss and explained that the fence used as a temporary storage of their work.
– How often do you turn on the theft of paintings from the fence? – Asked Alburi.
– I can not say exactly how often. We have a historic city can be often – suggested law enforcement.
The next interrogated journalist Anna Cheremisinova NTV. According to her, 4 June 2014 on an assignment, she went to the apartment and tried to remove Navalny story about how Alburi gives him a picture of “bad good man.” However, in the entrance of the house crew would not let wife opposition. About how the reporter learned about the gift Cheremisinova not say. “This is my producer told me, I do not know how he could know about it” – excuses witness.
At the judge ended the session. The hearing will continue next week, on March 31 will be required to interrogate the other prosecution witnesses.
PS After the meeting, journalists surrounded the victim’s cell phone and tried to talk to him, but not unknown man allowed the artist to answer a single question, grabbed the cellular hand and led her to the car.
No comments:
Post a Comment