The main accused of the murder of politician questioned 8th of March. Then he said that he went to the crime of religious motives
In the media have questioned the details Zaur Dadaeva – suspect in the murder of Boris Nemtsov. The newspaper “Kommersant” writes that such testimony former officer of the battalion “North” gave on March 8, and they were built the charges against him. According to sources, publications, Dadaev, in particular, reported that during the execution of the crime he was promised 5 million rubles, but he killed Nemtsov not for money, but because of religious beliefs. According to the report, asked Dadaev add another line protocol: “I apologize to God for what Nemtsov deprived of life».
As the Dadaev January 7, he learned that the Germans were “publicly justify The current edition of Charlie Hebdo »and furthermore:” publicly called on to publish such cartoons in the Russian media. ” How Dadaev said, for him and all Muslims these remarks were “offensive and unacceptable.” See also: The accused in the murder of Nemtsov addressed to the Committee against Torture
9 January Dadaev arrived in Moscow and stayed at the hotel “Salute”. He met fellow countrymen from Chechnya in the mall “European”, where they decided to install surveillance of Nemtsov. Address found on the Internet. On the outcome of surveillance Dadaev told a man named Rusik. He called a few days later and said that the car ZAZ Chance with a gun under his right passenger seat worth at street Fan, Building 3.
Dada and his associates continue to monitor Nemtsov, who randomly move around the city on the Range Rover. Find out where going to a politician, they could not. However, on 27 February, 21 hour Dadaev, who was walking near the house Nemtsov in the metro area Novokuznetsk, called Beslan Chavannes, said that “a politician sits with some girl in a tavern on the Red Square.” Another member of the group Anzor Gubashev on ZAZ Chance took Dadaeva, and they went to the Kremlin.
After waiting for a call from Shavanova reported that Nemtsov and his girlfriend go through Red Square to the Bolshoi Moscow River bridge, the company took with him observer and also went to the side of the bridge. In the car Dadaev took the gun and went out before the bridge and followed Nemtsov. He held the gun in his belt pants, pulling him to her stomach. Decided to shoot on the bridge: the time and place it seemed perfect.
caught up with a couple Dadaev pulled out a gun with his left hand (he is left-handed), and picked up the phone to the right. Shot in the back of politics, he said by telephone: “pulls”, then switched off the. Falling, wounded Germans threw the girl who all the while holding him by the arm, and then tried to get up. Seeing this, Dadaev even fired several shots at his victim. Then he got into the car, where the Gubashev Anzor and Beslan Chavannes. On it they got to the Swamp area where we left the car and ran away.
The next day Dadaev contacted Rusiko and handed it to the man the gun. His accomplices left in Ingushetia, and most Dadaeva Rusik drove to the airport.
Night destruction of the memorial on the spot death Nemtsov and recent media reports said the family’s lawyer Vadim Prokhorov, Boris Nemtsov.
Vadim Prokhorov: I do know that on Saturday night there was another in some way an incident when removed and flowers, and other designations place of death, but who did it perfectly it is not clear, at least not yet. However, I want to note that the very form of action is somewhat different than that’s the scoundrels who acted on Wednesday night, that is, there was not, as I understand it, a special mockery, insulting inscriptions, provocative photos on the spot death. In this case, all gathered in some bags and taken away. However, I would certainly see who did it, on what basis, but with regard to what happened on Wednesday night & lt; … & gt; we deal in order statements about the crime. Regarding the latter incident, I would like to seek clarification: whether it is any action, but held less blatant, whether it is not very successful actions of the authorities, but then in any case I would like to still have them on the official explanation, what’s going on.
You’ve probably already read an article in the publication “Kommersant” about the details of the interrogation of a suspect in the murder of Nemtsov Dadaeva. Do you believe voiced Dadaev details of this version? Or is he just learns someone’s text?
Vadim Prokhorov: You know, I have the impression, occasionally there’s some stuffing, which contain internal contradictions & lt; … & gt; Each occurrence of comment, I do not think it is necessary. I believe that the investigation can comment on some more significant segments, and are searching for some contradictions … My personal opinion is that, apparently, on present evidence, we can not exclude that the detainee does have relating to the commission of the crime. If their defense has a different opinion, please have the right to provide the relevant evidence, and in general the investigation, of course, it would not hurt, maybe more closely and formally deal with the media and victims.
No comments:
Post a Comment