The inaugural meeting of the “Committee on January 25,” conducted by representatives of patriotic platforms Glavred nationalist site “Sputnik and Mayhem” (M & As) Egor Prosvirnin, the founders of the National Democratic Party Konstantin Krylov, the leader of the National Bolshevik Party Eduard Limonov, by the Stalinists – writer Maxim Kalashnikov and Tyumen blogger Kungurov and Orientalist Anatoly Nesmiyan (LJ El Murid).
«the Committee on January 25,” the structure calls Maxim Kalashnikov, others prefer a more neutral name – council or a club, or just a playground.
Konstantin Krylov says “Gazeta.ru” that Strelkova around people gathered at minimal unifying feature: the famous people who openly support the New Russia and not liberal. A playground took most neutral name “January 25″ simply on the basis that in this day it established and this date shall not have any negative associations in the history of Russia. The word “yanvaristy” acting in an analogy with the Russian history of the Decembrists and the Octobrists, members of the new association is itself not called.
«This area without much structure. Open community of people with quite different views, for example, large differences between Limonov and Prosvirnin between NBP (banned in Russia) and the NDP. But we are all united around the rifle and united on two issues: the Russian people support the right to self-determination. And second, Russia should be a country fair, comfortable accommodation, with equal rights with Russian non-Russian, which is not available. This is the minimum set of ideas with which all agreed, ideological “navel” – explained Krylov.
According to him, the area can not be called a block, because “there is no free elections.” But the structure is necessary for an intensive exchange of information, “promote the texts to each other and avoid attacking each other».
Maxim Kalashnikov and Eduard Limonov in his LJ referred to the new site of the “third force” (in addition to the “guardians” and “pro-Western liberals”). “You now have where to go, who to join and under whose banner become in case of cataclysm. In addition to the government and pro-Western liberals, there was a third force “- optimistically says Limonov, explaining that the structure is needed,” that Russia did not get Khodorkovsky liberals ».
Projections for the future of Russia he, like the other founders apocalyptic.
«We agreed that the position of Russia rolled to a system crash that pro-Western liberals do not conceal their malice and pre tried on to power, and that power itself of the Russian Federation does everything for his fall . The situation is strongly reminiscent of the eve of the “Maidan” in Ukraine. At the same time there is no sound “third force” opposing both deadlock, bankrupt guardians and westernized belolentochnym “- says Kalashnikov.
He argues that the aim of the movement – to combine the red and white to prevent the collapse of Russia and “reunification of the Russian people in a single state».
The leader of the National Democrats Krylov clarifies: the organizers of the site are not engaged in illegal political activities and their actions a little related to the current policy, “but the situation may change in the historically insignificant time ».
M & Glavred believes that Russia is in a deep crisis and come out of it does not want. According to him, in this situation, organize themselves liberal forces. Prosvirnin calls not to repeat the mistakes of previous generations of patriots. It characterizes the founders of the movement as a “meritocratic assembly”: representatives of the “Russian National Army” – from the combatant commanders to tylovikov who helped the rebellion in the Donbass: “All those present not just talkers, theorists from the Internet, and those who showed themselves during the Donbas.” According to the source, the initiator of the meeting was the Gunners, but the idea that nurtured all the participants.
M & Glavred believes that the first meeting of the platform was successful and showed the proximity of the views of its organizers. He assures that the organizers are not intended to short-term public relations in the federal media, and do not promise “immediately save Russia”, but set themselves in the future global challenges – the creation of the Russian state and the equality of all before the law and the fight against serious social stratification.
«The first principle – the reunification of the Russian people not only in Ukraine, but reunited in Belarus and Kazakhstan, Russian. Irredenta should continue and not be limited only by Ukraine “, – lists Prosvirnin. It also proposes to change the system of the national republics in the Russian Federation, turning them into the province.
On the question of how the Stalinists could find common ground with white monarchists Prosvirnin says that the most important thing for the founders – is to help Russian abroad their united struggle for equitable Russia.
A more modest assessments of problems, “January 25″ Anatoly Nesmiyan. He says that on the global order platform to speak early and until an agreement is only on the level of a common news feeds.
«We all have an audience, with different views, interests, but there is a common understanding that it rolling to a systemic crisis, and it would be logical to dock our Information Resource “- explains Nesmiyan.
One of the supporters of Strelkova military analyst Boris Rozhin in his LiveJournal compared the initiative of information and political association with the attempt to the left to collect” Forum Left forces “in 2011-2012 to develop a common agenda and a broad compromise. You can also recall the example of the coalition “The Other Russia” sample 2006-2007, which tried to combine a wide range of opposition – from the NBP to Garry Kasparov and Mikhail Kasyanov. However, the structure collapsed due to irreconcilable contradictions of its founders.
Right in conflict with the authorities of the movement is going. “Our position in relation to the current government – neutrality – claims Kalashnikov. –
impose her helpers we do not intend. And make oneself dirty in it – too ».
Among the guardians area has already caused criticism. So, tweeted a leading TV project “Agitprop” on the channel “Russia 24″ Konstantin Syomin said that all the talk about the “third force” refer to Heinrich Himmler, the POA and the NTS.
close to the Kremlin political analyst Oleg Bondarenko believes that the arrow leaves no hope for a political career. “He believed in his own messianism and hurry to implement it. As in Donetsk he was not allowed to implement, then he decided to do it by political means. I think Gunmen treats for yourself part in the elections to the State Duma this year. This can be seen as a reminder of yourself to potential customers and future investors, for the election of the party or a single-mandate constituency. Set of people in this photograph is quite accidental, I do not think that they are in this format will hold for a long time, probably quarreled among themselves, such as citric and wings. In this format, the design is unlikely to be workable, but it’s a good way to Strelkova remind myself “, – said Bondarenko.
Also, the analyst calls the” Ukrainian “logic according to which the authority is about to collapse, and complained that such sentiments We won a part of the audience in Russia.
Igor Strelkov refused to comment on the initiative of the “Committee on 25 January,” although earlier repeatedly said “Gazeta.ru”, that under current conditions is not going to engage in politics, create a party and to be elected in State Duma.
After leaving the Donbass arrow is in serious conflict with the curator of the Ukrainian policy, Vladislav Surkov, which, according to sources “Gazety.Ru” prevents him from access to the Russian policy. In addition, because of the conflict of the former defense minister DNI hit the stop-lists of state media.
No comments:
Post a Comment