A few weeks after the events of the Crimean one notable domestic opposition said, forced to admit that the annexation of Crimea to Russia was carried out brilliantly. Needless joining oppositionist not like it, but he paid tribute to the quality of the implementation of this action .
to begin in late February of last year, the events that eventually led to a referendum on March 16 last year, output Crimea from Ukraine and joining Russia, of course, have every right to enter the country’s history books as one of the most brilliant actions of the state, which fully reflects the desires and citizens.
The key to success has been such a clear choice true means. By the time it was already clear that the language of words with opponents agree does not work, because nothing but hypocrisy and lies, they did not say. The only clear language, the only means of working – the action. Action with confidence in their own abilities and in their own right.
legally, legally perfect option at the moment was gone. No matter how unattractive Yanukovych, Ukraine’s constitution still does not imply a change of the power of this method, as its seizure of power. Therefore, perfectly legitimate power in Ukraine at the time was not. The choice was simple: either you accept that you have lost, or are you just take away his. Without any discussion, for fraudsters to negotiate with meaningless.
Now it began to be forgotten are numerous examples of iniquity Maidan “Russian snipers”, “peace rally”, “agreed with the President.” And began to forget the truth that sometimes breaks out: “Friendship Train”, “hang up and buried.” But then it was all fresh and clear. It was clear that the real people’s protest against the hard life and corruption were able to convert the seizure of power, in consequence of which one group of swindlers replaced by another – controlled, aggressive and docile.
It was clear what will happen in the Crimea, if not happen referendum to secede from Ukraine. NATO base in Sevastopol – it is the softest of the consequences. In Crimea, it would be much sadder than it is now in the Donbass.
A year ago, when Moscow liberals by inertia talked about the victory of democracy in Kiev, in the east of Ukraine and Crimea knew no democracy would be chaos , economic collapse, the atmosphere of hatred, some people bleed with others, censorship, theft, advocacy, poverty and war. Time has shown who was right.
Already written chronicle of the events underline the complete unpreparedness of the Kiev party to such a quick and confident action. They somehow thought that the situation will continue to chatter and somehow be able to “tune up”. The only way to take away the fraudster that belongs to you – is to take and pick up; attempts to negotiate – a waste of time.
Crimea belongs to residents of the Crimea, which, as it showed the referendum, fully agree with the fact that they are – part of Russian culture, Russian history and Russian modernity, and that they strongly disagree with the picture of the world that have come up, and then embodied in Kiev.
It is very telling was one of public opinion polls conducted in Russia last fall, after the entry into force of Western sanctions. More than three quarters of the respondents confirmed that notice a decline in their welfare. And at the same time, exactly the same number of respondents said that they consider joining the Crimea right step. Right steps can cause unpleasant consequences. But they do not necessarily from this cease to be true.
Once upon a time, people learned to negotiate with words. The promise was made to perform. Then it became clear that for opponents is the difference between action and speaking very great. You can lead a million examples of “weapons of mass destruction”, “peaceful protests”, “defense of democracy».
Stay true bylomu Code – in its own beautiful but deeply impractical. It is hoped that someday the situation will change, although the reasons for such hopes have not yet seen. Anyway, now the words are not working. Work activities.
Choosing the right tools and confident, clear and fast action of all forces in this situation – a great example to follow especially for the Russian state itself. Repeat this until his success in other areas it could not.
The only disadvantage of the Crimean history – is it “slogan.” The phrase “Crimea is our” sounds like Crimea – a thing that can be ours or not ours. Crimea – this, of course, a symbol, but above all – people. Its people.
It’s not that our Crimea. The bottom line is that we are together.
Sergey Gurkin – columnist IA REGNUM
No comments:
Post a Comment