MOSCOW, February 12 -. RIA Novosti Tver court of Moscow has explained the refusal to accept . sued the founder of the Fund’s fight against corruption Alexei Navalny to Russian President Vladimir Putin to the principle of separation of powers and presidential immunity
“by virtue of article 91 of the Russian Federation, President of the Russian Federation Constitution has immunity,” – It mentioned in the definition of a judge Tatyana Molitvinoy posted on the official website of the court.
The judge pointed out that “no claims can not be brought to the Russian Federation President in the administrative proceedings, since it would constitute a clear violation of the court of the principle of separation of powers and unlawful interference with the constitutional-legal and other activities of the President of the Russian Federation as the head of state, has immunity, exercising supreme state power in the Russian Federation, the guarantor of the Constitution, rights and freedoms of man and citizen, ensure coordinated functioning and interaction of bodies of state power in the Russian Federation “.
Therefore, the judge refused to accept the statement Navalny and ordered him to return the paid state fee of 300 rubles. The plaintiff has the right to appeal this decision in the Moscow City Court.
Last Thursday, the founder of the Fund’s fight against corruption has filed a lawsuit Tver Court of Moscow to Putin. He explained that he considers illegal, “inaction” of the president in the allocation of funds from the National Welfare Fund of the Russian petrochemical giant Sibur.
The founder of the Fund’s fight against corruption Alexei Navalny at the end of December 2014 was sentenced to 3.5 years in prison probation on charges of embezzling 26 million rubles from the company “Yves Rocher” and another 4 million in “Multidisciplinary processing company.” Before that Navalny has been conditionally sentenced to five years for embezzlement from the state enterprise “Kirovles”.
No comments:
Post a Comment